Nam NGUYEN

CAN · Senior · 2016–2018

Follow
Podiums
1 × 1st1 × 2nd

Highest jumps

Top element 4S+2T 11.39 2018 U.S. International Figure Skating Classic · Sep 13, 2018

Spins and steps

  • CCoSp4 Change foot combination spin · since Sep 2016
  • CSSp4 Change foot sit spin · since Sep 2016
  • FCCoSp4 Flying change foot combination spin · since Sep 2016
  • FCSp4 Flying camel spin · since Sep 2018
  • FSSp3 Flying sit spin · since Sep 2016
  • FCSSp2 Flying change foot sit spin · since Sep 2018
  • StSq3 Step sequence · since Apr 2016

Competition history

2018

Senior Men Short Program + Free Skating 2018 U.S. International Figure Skating Classic CAN 213.52 points 1st of 13
Place
1st
Score
80.28
Technical
42.93
Components
37.35
Elements, Short Program
ElementBaseGOEScore
4S 9.7 0 9.7
FCSp4 3.2 0.32 3.52
3A 8 2.08 10.08
CSSp3 2.6 0.47 3.07
3Lz+3T< 9.96 -1.77 8.19
StSq3 3.3 0.73 4.03
CCoSp4 3.5 0.84 4.34
Program components, Short Program
ComponentFactorScore
Composition17.55
Interpretation of the Music17.5
Performance17.5
Skating Skills17.5
Transitions17.3
Place
2nd
Score
133.24
Technical
60.84
Components
72.4
Elements, Free Skating
ElementBaseGOEScore
4S+2T 11 0.39 11.39
4S 9.7 1.55 11.25
3Lz 5.9 -0.35 5.55
FCSSp2 2.3 0.23 2.53
StSq2 2.6 0.42 3.02
3A 8 1.44 9.44
3F+2T 7.26 0.53 7.79
1F 0.55 -0.05 0.5
FCCoSp3 3 0.18 3.18
ChSq1 3 0.6 3.6
CCoSp2V 1.88 0.19 2.07
1Lo 0.55 -0.03 0.52
Program components, Free Skating
ComponentFactorScore
Composition214.7
Interpretation of the Music214.6
Performance214
Skating Skills214.8
Transitions214.3

2016

Senior Men Short Program + Free Skate 2016 U.S. International Figure Skating Classic CAN 220.55 points 5th of 13
Place
5th
Score
74.08
Technical
39.58
Components
35.5
Deductions
1
Elements, Short Program
ElementBaseGOEScore
4S 10.5 -4 6.5
3A 8.5 0.2 8.7
FCSp3 2.8 0 2.8
3F+3T 10.56 0.42 10.98
StSq2 2.6 0.5 3.1
CSSp4 3 0.5 3.5
CCoSp4 3.5 0.5 4
Program components, Short Program
ComponentFactorScore
Composition17.2
Interpretation of the Music17.45
Performance17.15
Skating Skills17
Transitions16.7

Printed deductions 1

Place
5th
Score
146.47
Technical
75.77
Components
70.7
Elements, Free Skate
ElementBaseGOEScore
1S 0.4 -0.04 0.36
3A 8.5 0 8.5
3A+2T 9.8 0.8 10.6
FSSp3 2.6 0 2.6
ChSq1 2 0.42 2.42
4S 11.55 -2.4 9.15
3Lz 6.6 0.14 6.74
3Lo 5.61 0.42 6.03
3F+3T+2Lo 12.54 -0.42 12.12
StSq3 3.3 0.2 3.5
3S+2T 6.27 0.28 6.55
FCCoSp4 3.5 0.1 3.6
CCoSp4 3.5 0.1 3.6
Program components, Free Skate
ComponentFactorScore
Composition213.9
Interpretation of the Music214.5
Performance214.2
Skating Skills214.2
Transitions213.9
Men's Team Challenge · Men's Grp 1 Men's Group 1 2016 Team Challenge Cup CAN 127.1 points 3rd of 3
Place
3rd
Score
127.1
Technical
58.8
Components
69.3
Deductions
1
Elements, Men's Group 1
ElementBaseGOEScore
4T 10.3 -4 6.3
3A<< 3.3 -1.4 1.9
3S 4.4 0.28 4.68
FCSSp3 2.6 0.3 2.9
StSq2 2.6 0.4 3
3A+REP 6.55 -2.6 3.95
3Lz 6.6 0.56 7.16
3F+3T 10.56 -0.98 9.58
1Lo 0.55 -0.1 0.45
CCoSp3p4 3.5 0.1 3.6
ChSq1 2 0.7 2.7
3F+2T+2Lo 9.24 0.14 9.38
FCCoSp3p3 3 0.2 3.2
Program components, Men's Group 1
ComponentFactorScore
Choreography/Composition214
Interpretation214
Performance/Execution213.6
Skating Skills214.2
Transitions/Linking Footwork/Movement213.5

Printed deductions 1

Men's Head to Head · Men's Grp 2 Men's Group 2 2016 Team Challenge Cup CAN 64.91 points 2nd of 3
Place
2nd
Score
64.91
Technical
32.56
Components
34.35
Deductions
2
Elements, Men's Group 2
ElementBaseGOEScore
4T 10.3 -4 6.3
3A< 5.9 -3 2.9
CSSp3 2.6 0.1 2.7
FCSp3 2.8 0.2 3
3F+3T 10.56 0 10.56
StSq3 3.3 0.5 3.8
CCoSp3p3 3 0.3 3.3
Program components, Men's Group 2
ComponentFactorScore
Choreography/Composition17
Interpretation16.9
Performance/Execution16.65
Skating Skills16.95
Transitions/Linking Footwork/Movement16.85

Printed deductions 2

Majority

In 6.0 judging each judge ranks the skaters. “3/1” means three judges placed this skater first, a majority of the panel.

How scoring works

6.0 results

Judges rank the skaters instead of scoring them, so a 6.0 result is a placement and cannot be compared as a number.

How scoring works

IJS

The International Judging System scores every element and the program components, and the points add up to the total.

How scoring works

CJS

The judging system used at Compete USA events scores program components only, with no element scores, so its totals do not compare with IJS totals.

How scoring works

Technical score (TES)

The points for every jump, spin and step sequence: each element’s base value plus its grade of execution.

How scoring works

Component score (PCS)

The judges’ marks for the program as a whole, such as skating skills, composition and presentation, multiplied by a factor.

How scoring works

Deductions

Points taken off the segment score, for example for a fall or a time violation.

How scoring works

Base value

What an element is worth before the judges grade how well it was done.

How scoring works

Grade of execution (GOE)

The judges’ quality grade for an element, from −5 to +5, added to or taken from its base value.

How scoring works

Factor

The multiplier a level and segment apply to each program component mark.

How scoring works

Call marks

q quarter short · < under-rotated · << downgraded · e wrong edge · ! unclear edge. The technical panel adds them to the element code.

How scoring works

Sign in to Rinkday

Opening sign-in…