Imagica Of Boston (AComb)

SC of Boston · 2022–2025

Follow
Podiums
1 × 1st2 × 3rd

Competition history

2025

Adult Combined Choreographic Exercise + Free Performance 2025 National Theatre On Ice 76.06 points 9th of 12
Place
9th
Score
24.46
Technical
0
Components
24.46
Program components, Choreographic Exercise
ComponentFactorScore
Blending of Axes1.54.65
Choreographic Process1.54.88
Prescribed Gesture1.55.25
Presentation of Theme1.55.18
Skating Skills1.54.5
Place
9th
Score
51.6
Technical
0
Components
51.6
Program components, Free Performance
ComponentFactorScore
Composition310.35
Gestures39.6
Skating Skills39
Theatricality311.1
Universe311.55
Adult Theatre on Ice Choreographic Exercise + Free Performance 2025 Theatre On Ice Spring Classic 89.25 points 1st of 2
Place
1st
Score
31.02
Technical
0
Components
31.02
Program components, Choreographic Exercise
ComponentFactorScore
Blending of Axes1.56.63
Choreographic Process1.56.26
Prescribed Gesture1.56.5
Presentation of Theme1.56.26
Skating Skills1.55.37
Place
1st
Score
58.23
Technical
0
Components
58.23
Program components, Free Performance
ComponentFactorScore
Composition312
Gestures311.49
Skating Skills39.51
Theatricality312.24
Universe312.99

2024

Adult Combined Choreographic Exercise + Free Performance 2024 National Theatre On Ice Competition 67.16 points 3rd of 13
Place
3rd
Score
24.44
Technical
0
Components
24.44
Program components, Choreographic Exercise
ComponentFactorScore
Choreo Process0.93.64
CP / G Consistency1.25.11
Gesture0.93.69
Skating Skills1.55.4
SS Support Music/Theme1.56.6
Place
3rd
Score
42.72
Technical
0
Components
42.72
Program components, Free Performance
ComponentFactorScore
Choreo Composition1.858.7
Creation of a Universe1.859.23
Quality of Groups1.858.6
Skating Skills1.857.31
Theatricality1.858.88

2022

Adult Combined Choreographic Exercise + Free Performance 2022 National Theatre On Ice Competition 65.79 points 3rd of 10
Place
4th
Score
22.66
Technical
0
Components
22.66
Program components, Choreographic Exercise
ComponentFactorScore
Choreo Process0.93.3
CP / G Consistency1.24.52
Gesture0.93.6
Skating Skills1.55.5
SS Support Music/Theme1.55.74
Place
3rd
Score
43.13
Technical
0
Components
43.63
Deductions
0.5
Program components, Free Performance
ComponentFactorScore
Choreo Composition1.386.44
Creation of a Universe2.311.5
Quality of Groups1.386.44
Skating Skills1.847.36
Theatricality2.311.89

Printed deductions 0.5

Majority

In 6.0 judging each judge ranks the skaters. “3/1” means three judges placed this skater first, a majority of the panel.

How scoring works

6.0 results

Judges rank the skaters instead of scoring them, so a 6.0 result is a placement and cannot be compared as a number.

How scoring works

IJS

The International Judging System scores every element and the program components, and the points add up to the total.

How scoring works

CJS

The judging system used at Compete USA events scores program components only, with no element scores, so its totals do not compare with IJS totals.

How scoring works

Technical score (TES)

The points for every jump, spin and step sequence: each element’s base value plus its grade of execution.

How scoring works

Component score (PCS)

The judges’ marks for the program as a whole, such as skating skills, composition and presentation, multiplied by a factor.

How scoring works

Deductions

Points taken off the segment score, for example for a fall or a time violation.

How scoring works

Base value

What an element is worth before the judges grade how well it was done.

How scoring works

Grade of execution (GOE)

The judges’ quality grade for an element, from −5 to +5, added to or taken from its base value.

How scoring works

Factor

The multiplier a level and segment apply to each program component mark.

How scoring works

Call marks

q quarter short · < under-rotated · << downgraded · e wrong edge · ! unclear edge. The technical panel adds them to the element code.

How scoring works

Sign in to Rinkday

Opening sign-in…