Emily Langley

Rivier University · Senior · 2015–2018

Follow
Best finish
19th of 22 Senior Ladies 2018 US Collegiate Figure Skating Championships · Aug 2, 2018

Bests

Senior · IJS · Rules before 2018–19

Short program
18.16 2017 U.S. Collegiates Aug 4, 2017

Highest jumps

Top element CCoSp4 3.38 2018 US Collegiate Figure Skating Championships · Aug 2, 2018

Spins and steps

  • CCoSp4 Change foot combination spin · since Aug 2017
  • FCCoSp3 Flying change foot combination spin · since Aug 2017
  • LSp2 Layback spin · since Aug 2015
  • FCSp1 Flying camel spin · since Aug 2017
  • StSq1 Step sequence · since Aug 2018

Competition history

2018

Senior Ladies Short Program + Free Skate 2018 US Collegiate Figure Skating Championships 67.62 points 19th of 22
Place
21st
Score
20.02
Technical
8.2
Components
12.82
Deductions
1
Elements, Short Program
ElementBaseGOEScore
StSq1 1.8 -0.12 1.68
2Lo<< 0.5 -0.25 0.25
FCSp1 1.9 -0.32 1.58
2F<<+COMBO 0.5 -0.25 0.25
CCoSp3 3 0.2 3.2
LSpB 1.2 0.04 1.24
1A* 0 0 0
Program components, Short Program
ComponentFactorScore
Composition0.82.74
Interpretation of the Music0.82.74
Performance0.82.54
Skating Skills0.82.46
Transitions0.82.34

Printed deductions 1

Place
17th
Score
47.6
Technical
22.27
Components
25.33
Elements, Free Skate
ElementBaseGOEScore
1A+1Lo+2Lo 3.3 -0.23 3.07
2F< 1.35 -0.27 1.08
2Lo< 1.28 -0.26 1.02
FCCoSp3 3 -0.1 2.9
StSq1 1.8 -0.18 1.62
2T+1T 1.7 -0.13 1.57
2F<<+1T 0.99 -0.15 0.84
ChSq1 3 0.33 3.33
2T 1.43 -0.22 1.21
1A 1.21 0.04 1.25
LSpB 1.2 -0.2 1
CCoSp4 3.5 -0.12 3.38
Program components, Free Skate
ComponentFactorScore
Composition1.65.33
Interpretation of the Music1.64.93
Performance1.65.07
Skating Skills1.65.2
Transitions1.64.8

2017

Senior Ladies Short Program + Free Skate 2017 U.S. Collegiates 52.86 points 25th of 25
Place
24th
Score
18.16
Technical
8.76
Components
10.4
Deductions
1
Elements, Short Program
ElementBaseGOEScore
1A* 0 0 0
2T 1.3 -0.3 1
FCSp1 1.9 -0.3 1.6
StSqB 1.5 -0.15 1.35
2F<+COMBO 1.54 -0.9 0.64
LSpB 1.2 -0.3 0.9
CCoSp4 3.5 -0.23 3.27
Program components, Short Program
ComponentFactorScore
Composition0.82.1
Interpretation of the Music0.82.15
Performance0.82
Skating Skills0.82.25
Transitions0.81.9

Printed deductions 1

Place
24th
Score
34.7
Technical
16.3
Components
18.4
Elements, Free Skate
ElementBaseGOEScore
1A+1Lo+2Lo< 2.9 -0.3 2.6
2F<< 0.5 -0.2 0.3
2Lo 1.8 -0.08 1.72
FCCoSp3 3 -0.38 2.62
StSqB 1.5 -0.53 0.97
2T<< 0.44 -0.3 0.14
2F<< 0.55 -0.2 0.35
ChSq1 2 -0.5 1.5
2T<< 0.44 -0.3 0.14
1A 1.21 0 1.21
LSp1 1.5 0.25 1.75
CCoSp3 3 0 3
Program components, Free Skate
ComponentFactorScore
Composition1.64.1
Interpretation of the Music1.63.6
Performance1.63.6
Skating Skills1.63.9
Transitions1.63.2

2015

Senior Ladies Short Program + Free Skating 2015 U.S. Collegiate Championships River University 54.71 points 35th of 35
Place
37th
Score
17.77
Technical
5.97
Components
11.8
Elements, Short Program
ElementBaseGOEScore
1Lo* 0 0 0
LSp1 1.5 0 1.5
1F*+1Lo* 0 0 0
FSSp1V1 1.4 -0.75 0.65
StSqB 1.5 -0.53 0.97
1A* 0 0 0
CCoSp3p3 3 -0.15 2.85
Program components, Short Program
ComponentFactorScore
Choreography/Composition0.82.5
Interpretation0.82.6
Performance/Execution0.82.2
Skating Skills0.82.4
Transitions/Linking Footwork/Movement0.82.1
Place
35th
Score
36.94
Technical
13.42
Components
24.52
Deductions
1
Elements, Free Skating
ElementBaseGOEScore
1A+1Lo+1T 2 0 2
1F+1T 0.9 0 0.9
2S< 0.9 -0.6 0.3
LSp2 1.9 0 1.9
FCCoSp2p1 1.4 -0.68 0.72
StSqB 1.5 -0.45 1.05
1Lo 0.55 0 0.55
1F+1T 0.99 0 0.99
ChSq1 2 0 2
1S*+1T* 0 0 0
1A 1.21 0 1.21
CCoSp2p2 1.8 0 1.8
Program components, Free Skating
ComponentFactorScore
Choreography/Composition1.65.3
Interpretation1.64.8
Performance/Execution1.64.61
Skating Skills1.65.2
Transitions/Linking Footwork/Movement1.64.61

Printed deductions 1

Majority

In 6.0 judging each judge ranks the skaters. “3/1” means three judges placed this skater first, a majority of the panel.

How scoring works

6.0 results

Judges rank the skaters instead of scoring them, so a 6.0 result is a placement and cannot be compared as a number.

How scoring works

IJS

The International Judging System scores every element and the program components, and the points add up to the total.

How scoring works

CJS

The judging system used at Compete USA events scores program components only, with no element scores, so its totals do not compare with IJS totals.

How scoring works

Technical score (TES)

The points for every jump, spin and step sequence: each element’s base value plus its grade of execution.

How scoring works

Component score (PCS)

The judges’ marks for the program as a whole, such as skating skills, composition and presentation, multiplied by a factor.

How scoring works

Deductions

Points taken off the segment score, for example for a fall or a time violation.

How scoring works

Base value

What an element is worth before the judges grade how well it was done.

How scoring works

Grade of execution (GOE)

The judges’ quality grade for an element, from −5 to +5, added to or taken from its base value.

How scoring works

Factor

The multiplier a level and segment apply to each program component mark.

How scoring works

Call marks

q quarter short · < under-rotated · << downgraded · e wrong edge · ! unclear edge. The technical panel adds them to the element code.

How scoring works

Sign in to Rinkday

Opening sign-in…