- Best finish
- 6th of 6 Intermediate Women Excel · Free skate 2022 Boston Open · Sep 30, 2022
Highest jumps
- 1Lz
Lutz · 3× · since Sep 2021
- 1Lo
Loop · 2× · since Sep 2021
- 1S
Salchow · 1× · since Sep 2022
- 1T
Toe loop · 1× · since Sep 2022
Top element ChSt1 1.83 2021 Boston Open · Sep 30, 2021
Spins and steps
- CSp1 Camel spin · since Sep 2021
Competition history
2024
2023
Novice Women Excel Free skate 2023 Cranberry Open 16.69 points 11th of 11
- Place
- 11th
- Score
- 16.69
- Technical
- 3.89
- Components
- 13.8
- Deductions
- 1
| Element | Base | GOE | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCoSp | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1Lz+A+SEQ | 0.6 | -0.06 | 0.54 |
| CSp | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2Lo<< | 0.5 | -0.25 | 0.25 |
| 1A<< | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2S< | 1.04 | -0.5 | 0.54 |
| 2Sq+REP | 1 | -0.65 | 0.35 |
| StSqB+kpN | 1.5 | -0.3 | 1.2 |
| 1Lo | 0.55 | -0.16 | 0.39 |
| FCSp | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1A< | 0.97 | -0.35 | 0.62 |
| 2Lo<<* | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Component | Factor | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 2.5 | 5 |
| Presentation | 2.5 | 4.7 |
| Skating Skills | 2.5 | 4.1 |
Printed deductions 1
2022
Intermediate Women Excel Free skate 2022 Boston Open 14.74 points 6th of 6
- Place
- 6th
- Score
- 14.74
- Technical
- 5.43
- Components
- 10.31
- Deductions
- 1
| Element | Base | GOE | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Lze | 0.48 | -0.14 | 0.34 |
| 2S< | 1.04 | -0.52 | 0.52 |
| 1A<< | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CSp1 | 1.4 | -0.09 | 1.31 |
| ChSt1 | 2 | -0.33 | 1.67 |
| 1S+1T | 0.88 | -0.03 | 0.85 |
| FCCoSp | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1F+2T<< | 0.99 | -0.25 | 0.74 |
| Component | Factor | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 1.25 | 2.5 |
| Presentation | 1.25 | 1.88 |
| Skating Skills | 3.75 | 5.93 |
Printed deductions 1
2021
Intermediate Ladies Excel Free skate 2021 Boston Open 20.87 points 9th of 9
- Place
- 9th
- Score
- 20.87
- Technical
- 6.36
- Components
- 15.01
- Deductions
- 0.5
| Element | Base | GOE | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Lze | 0.48 | -0.12 | 0.36 |
| 2S< | 1.04 | -0.52 | 0.52 |
| 1A<< | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CSp1 | 1.4 | 0.07 | 1.47 |
| ChSt1 | 2 | -0.17 | 1.83 |
| 2Sq+SEQ+1T* | 1.14 | -0.46 | 0.68 |
| CoSp | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1Lze+1Lo+1T<< | 1.08 | -0.14 | 0.94 |
| 1F | 0.55 | 0.01 | 0.56 |
| Component | Factor | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Interpretation of the Music | 1.25 | 2.89 |
| Performance | 1.25 | 2.74 |
| Skating Skills | 3.75 | 9.38 |
Printed deductions 0.5
Majority
In 6.0 judging each judge ranks the skaters. “3/1” means three judges placed this skater first, a majority of the panel.
How scoring works6.0 results
Judges rank the skaters instead of scoring them, so a 6.0 result is a placement and cannot be compared as a number.
How scoring worksIJS
The International Judging System scores every element and the program components, and the points add up to the total.
How scoring worksCJS
The judging system used at Compete USA events scores program components only, with no element scores, so its totals do not compare with IJS totals.
How scoring worksTechnical score (TES)
The points for every jump, spin and step sequence: each element’s base value plus its grade of execution.
How scoring worksComponent score (PCS)
The judges’ marks for the program as a whole, such as skating skills, composition and presentation, multiplied by a factor.
How scoring worksDeductions
Points taken off the segment score, for example for a fall or a time violation.
How scoring worksGrade of execution (GOE)
The judges’ quality grade for an element, from −5 to +5, added to or taken from its base value.
How scoring worksCall marks
q quarter short · < under-rotated · << downgraded · e wrong edge · ! unclear edge. The technical panel adds them to the element code.
How scoring works