Natalie Prescott

Centennial SC · Aspire 2 · 2024–2026

Follow
Podiums
12 × 1st8 × 2nd2 × 3rd

Competition history

2026

Level 2 Spins ChallengeNew Short program 2026 Colorado Springs Invitational/RMSG 14.32 points 2nd of 3
Place
2nd
Score
14.32
Technical
0
Components
14.32
ComponentFactorScore
Skating Skills4.16.82
Technical4.17.5
Open event results Performance page Centennial SC at this competition
Level 2 Jump ChallengeNew Short program 2026 Colorado Springs Invitational/RMSG 11.84 points 2nd of 3
Place
2nd
Score
11.84
Technical
0
Components
11.84
ComponentFactorScore
Skating Skills4.055.76
Technical4.056.08
Open event results Performance page Centennial SC at this competition
Level 2 Compulsory Moves Grp ANew Short program 2026 Colorado Springs Invitational/RMSG 13.18 points 2nd of 3
Place
2nd
Score
13.18
Technical
0
Components
13.18
ComponentFactorScore
Skating Skills4.066.4
Technical4.066.78
Open event results Performance page Centennial SC at this competition
Aspire 2 Grp ANew Free skate 2026 Colorado Springs Invitational/RMSG 16.12 points 2nd of 6
Place
2nd
Score
16.12
Technical
0
Components
16.12
ComponentFactorScore
Comp/Perf3.025.28
Skating Skills3.025.31
Technical3.025.53
Open event results Performance page Centennial SC at this competition
Level 1 Compulsory Moves Grp A Short program 2026 Broadmoor Open 4 points 1st of 5
Place
1st
Score
4
Technical
4
Components
0
ElementBaseGOEScore
USp1 1.2 0.03 1.23
pChSq1 1.5 0.31 1.81
1Wz+1Wz+SEQ 0.6 0.04 0.64
1HF 0.3 0.02 0.32
Open event results Centennial SC at this competition
Compulsory Moves Level 1 Grp A Short program 2026 Front Range Invitational 3.89 points 1st of 4
Place
1st
Score
3.89
Technical
3.89
Components
0
ElementBaseGOEScore
USp1 1.2 0.04 1.24
pChSq1 1.5 0.25 1.75
1Wz+1Wz+SEQ 0.6 0 0.6
1HF 0.3 0 0.3
Open event results Centennial SC at this competition

2025

Earlier results

Majority

In 6.0 judging each judge ranks the skaters. “3/1” means three judges placed this skater first, a majority of the panel.

How scoring works

6.0 results

Judges rank the skaters instead of scoring them, so a 6.0 result is a placement and cannot be compared as a number.

How scoring works

IJS

The International Judging System scores every element and the program components, and the points add up to the total.

How scoring works

CJS

The judging system used at Compete USA events scores program components only, with no element scores, so its totals do not compare with IJS totals.

How scoring works

Technical score (TES)

The points for every jump, spin and step sequence: each element’s base value plus its grade of execution.

How scoring works

Component score (PCS)

The judges’ marks for the program as a whole, such as skating skills, composition and presentation, multiplied by a factor.

How scoring works

Deductions

Points taken off the segment score, for example for a fall or a time violation.

How scoring works

Base value

What an element is worth before the judges grade how well it was done.

How scoring works

Grade of execution (GOE)

The judges’ quality grade for an element, from −5 to +5, added to or taken from its base value.

How scoring works

Factor

The multiplier a level and segment apply to each program component mark.

How scoring works

Call marks

q quarter short · < under-rotated · << downgraded · e wrong edge · ! unclear edge. The technical panel adds them to the element code.

How scoring works

Sign in to Rinkday
Opening sign-in…