Lila Werner

Individual Member · Senior · 2017–2021

Follow
Podiums
1 × 1st

Highest jumps

Top element ChSq1 3.5 37th Margaret Faulkner Springtime Invitational · May 20, 2021

Spins and steps

  • CCoSp3 Change foot combination spin · since Aug 2017
  • FSSp2 Flying sit spin · since Aug 2017
  • LSp1 Layback spin · since Aug 2017
  • StSqB Step sequence · since Aug 2017

Competition history

2021

Senior Ladies Excel - #170 Free skate 37th Margaret Faulkner Springtime Invitational 47.27 points 1st of 3
Place
1st
Score
47.27
Technical
21.63
Components
25.64
ElementBaseGOEScore
2Lz 2.1 0.28 2.38
LSp1 1.5 -0.1 1.4
2F<< 0.5 -0.23 0.27
1A 1.1 0 1.1
1Lz 0.6 0 0.6
ChSq1 3 0.5 3.5
CCoSp3 3 0.4 3.4
StSqB 1.5 0.15 1.65
2S+1T 1.87 0 1.87
2F+T 1.98 -0.42 1.56
2S 1.43 0.09 1.52
FSSp2 2.3 0.08 2.38
ComponentFactorScore
Interpretation of the Music1.255.21
Performance1.254.79
Skating Skills3.7515.64
Open event results

2017

Senior Ladies Short Program + Free Skate 2017 U.S. Collegiates Adrian College 67.19 points 21st of 25
Place
23rd
Score
20.52
Technical
8.82
Components
11.7
ElementBaseGOEScore
2Lz+1Lo* 2.1 -0.9 1.2
CCoSp3 3 -0.38 2.62
1F* 0 0 0
StSqB 1.5 -0.23 1.27
FSSp2 2.3 -0.3 2
2A<< 1.21 -0.6 0.61
LSpB 1.2 -0.08 1.12
ComponentFactorScore
Composition0.82.55
Interpretation of the Music0.82.35
Performance0.82.3
Skating Skills0.82.5
Transitions0.82
Place
19th
Score
46.67
Technical
19.85
Components
26.82
ElementBaseGOEScore
2Lz+2Lo+2Lo<< 4.4 -0.68 3.72
LSp1 1.5 0 1.5
2F+2T< 2.8 -0.83 1.97
StSqB 1.5 0 1.5
2S+1T 1.7 0 1.7
1Lz 0.6 -0.05 0.55
1F 0.55 -0.03 0.52
CCoSp1 2 -0.3 1.7
ChSq1 2 0.35 2.35
1A 1.21 0 1.21
2S 1.43 0 1.43
FSSp1 2 -0.3 1.7
ComponentFactorScore
Composition1.65.5
Interpretation of the Music1.65.41
Performance1.65.41
Skating Skills1.65.6
Transitions1.64.9
Open event results Adrian College at this competition

Majority

In 6.0 judging each judge ranks the skaters. “3/1” means three judges placed this skater first, a majority of the panel.

How scoring works

6.0 results

Judges rank the skaters instead of scoring them, so a 6.0 result is a placement and cannot be compared as a number.

How scoring works

IJS

The International Judging System scores every element and the program components, and the points add up to the total.

How scoring works

CJS

The judging system used at Compete USA events scores program components only, with no element scores, so its totals do not compare with IJS totals.

How scoring works

Technical score (TES)

The points for every jump, spin and step sequence: each element’s base value plus its grade of execution.

How scoring works

Component score (PCS)

The judges’ marks for the program as a whole, such as skating skills, composition and presentation, multiplied by a factor.

How scoring works

Deductions

Points taken off the segment score, for example for a fall or a time violation.

How scoring works

Base value

What an element is worth before the judges grade how well it was done.

How scoring works

Grade of execution (GOE)

The judges’ quality grade for an element, from −5 to +5, added to or taken from its base value.

How scoring works

Factor

The multiplier a level and segment apply to each program component mark.

How scoring works

Call marks

q quarter short · < under-rotated · << downgraded · e wrong edge · ! unclear edge. The technical panel adds them to the element code.

How scoring works

Sign in to Rinkday
Opening sign-in…