- Podiums
- 1 × 2nd
Bests
Excel Junior · IJS · 2022–23 rules onward
- Free skate
- 35.19 50th Annual Robin Lee Midwest Open Competition Aug 5, 2022
Highest jumps
- 1F
Flip · 3× · since Jun 2022
Top element ChSq1 3.17 2023 Northern Blades Rising Stars Figure Skating C · Oct 7, 2023
Spins and steps
Competition history
2023
Juvenile Solo Free dance 2023 Autumn Skate Fest 2nd of 2
Junior Free skate 2023 Northern Blades Rising Stars Figure Skating C 44.6 points 1st of 1
- Place
- 1st
- Score
- 44.6
- Technical
- 15.44
- Components
- 29.16
| Element | Base | GOE | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | 1.1 | 0 | 1.1 |
| CCoSp1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 2S<< | 0.4 | -0.13 | 0.27 |
| 1Lo | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 |
| 2T | 1.3 | -0.09 | 1.21 |
| ChSq1 | 3 | 0.17 | 3.17 |
| LSp1 | 1.5 | 0.05 | 1.55 |
| 1S+1Lo | 0.99 | 0 | 0.99 |
| 1F+1A+1Lo+SEQ | 2.31 | 0 | 2.31 |
| 1T | 0.44 | -0.13 | 0.31 |
| FCSp1 | 1.9 | 0.13 | 2.03 |
| Component | Factor | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 2.67 | 9.8 |
| Presentation | 2.67 | 9.8 |
| Skating Skills | 2.67 | 9.56 |
Excel Junior Women Free skate 2023 Braemar Competition 33.33 points 5th of 5
- Place
- 5th
- Score
- 33.33
- Technical
- 13.22
- Components
- 21.11
- Deductions
- 1
| Element | Base | GOE | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | 1.1 | 0 | 1.1 |
| CCSp1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 2S | 1.3 | 0 | 1.3 |
| 1Lo | 0.5 | 0.01 | 0.51 |
| 2T | 1.3 | -0.26 | 1.04 |
| ChSq1 | 3 | 0.13 | 3.13 |
| LSp1* | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2S<<+REP | 0.31 | -0.18 | 0.13 |
| 1F+1A+SEQ | 1.76 | 0 | 1.76 |
| 2Tq+REP | 1 | -0.65 | 0.35 |
| FCSp1 | 1.9 | 0 | 1.9 |
| Component | Factor | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 2.7 | 7.26 |
| Presentation | 2.7 | 6.75 |
| Skating Skills | 2.7 | 7.1 |
Printed deductions 1
2022
Excel Junior Women Free skate 50th Annual Robin Lee Midwest Open Competition 35.19 points 2nd of 3
- Place
- 2nd
- Score
- 35.19
- Technical
- 13
- Components
- 23.19
- Deductions
- 1
| Element | Base | GOE | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | 1.1 | 0.04 | 1.14 |
| ChSq1* | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FCSp1 | 1.9 | 0 | 1.9 |
| 1F+1A+COMBO+1Lo | 2.1 | -0.37 | 1.73 |
| 2S<< | 0.4 | -0.16 | 0.24 |
| 2Lo< | 1.36 | -0.68 | 0.68 |
| CSSpB | 1.6 | -0.11 | 1.49 |
| 2T+1T | 1.87 | -0.04 | 1.83 |
| 2S<+REP | 0.8 | -0.24 | 0.56 |
| 2T | 1.43 | 0 | 1.43 |
| CCoSp1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Component | Factor | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 2.7 | 7.88 |
| Presentation | 2.7 | 7.42 |
| Skating Skills | 2.7 | 7.89 |
Printed deductions 1
Excel Junior Women Free skate 2022 Braemar Competition 43.1 points 3rd of 3
- Place
- 3rd
- Score
- 43.1
- Technical
- 16.96
- Components
- 26.14
| Element | Base | GOE | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | 1.1 | 0 | 1.1 |
| 1Lo | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0.52 |
| FCSp1 | 1.9 | 0.19 | 2.09 |
| 1F+1T+1Lo | 1.4 | 0 | 1.4 |
| 2S+1Lo | 1.8 | -0.17 | 1.63 |
| CSSpBV | 1.2 | 0.04 | 1.24 |
| 2T+1T | 1.87 | 0 | 1.87 |
| StSq1 | 1.8 | 0 | 1.8 |
| 2S | 1.43 | -0.22 | 1.21 |
| 2T | 1.43 | 0 | 1.43 |
| CCoSp2 | 2.5 | 0.17 | 2.67 |
| Component | Factor | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 1.6 | 5.47 |
| Interpretation of the Music | 1.6 | 5.07 |
| Performance | 1.6 | 4.93 |
| Skating Skills | 1.6 | 5.47 |
| Transitions | 1.6 | 5.2 |
Majority
In 6.0 judging each judge ranks the skaters. “3/1” means three judges placed this skater first, a majority of the panel.
How scoring works6.0 results
Judges rank the skaters instead of scoring them, so a 6.0 result is a placement and cannot be compared as a number.
How scoring worksIJS
The International Judging System scores every element and the program components, and the points add up to the total.
How scoring worksCJS
The judging system used at Compete USA events scores program components only, with no element scores, so its totals do not compare with IJS totals.
How scoring worksTechnical score (TES)
The points for every jump, spin and step sequence: each element’s base value plus its grade of execution.
How scoring worksComponent score (PCS)
The judges’ marks for the program as a whole, such as skating skills, composition and presentation, multiplied by a factor.
How scoring worksDeductions
Points taken off the segment score, for example for a fall or a time violation.
How scoring worksGrade of execution (GOE)
The judges’ quality grade for an element, from −5 to +5, added to or taken from its base value.
How scoring worksCall marks
q quarter short · < under-rotated · << downgraded · e wrong edge · ! unclear edge. The technical panel adds them to the element code.
How scoring works