- Best finish
- 4th of 4 Aspire 3 Girls Grp B · Unclassified 2026 All Year Open · May 30, 2026
Bests
Intermediate · IJS · Rules before 2018–19
- Free skate
- 43.4 2017 Southwest Pacific Regional FS Championships Sep 28, 2016
Highest jumps
- 2Lz
Lutz · 4× · since Sep 2016
- 2F
Flip · 4× · since Sep 2016
- 2S
Salchow · 2× · since Sep 2016
- 2T
Toe loop · 2× · since Sep 2016
- 1A
Axel · 4× · since Sep 2016
- 1Lo
Loop · 2× · since Sep 2016
Spins and steps
Competition history
2026
2025
Aspire 2 Girls Grp A Free skate 20th Annual California Championships 4th of 4
2017
Intermediate Ladies QR Grp A Free skate 2018 Southwest Pacific Regional FS Championships 42.32 points 9th of 15
- Place
- 9th
- Score
- 42.32
- Technical
- 18.18
- Components
- 25.64
- Deductions
- 1.5
| Element | Base | GOE | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.3 |
| 2S | 1.3 | -0.05 | 1.25 |
| 2Lz | 2.1 | -0.9 | 1.2 |
| LSp2 | 1.9 | -0.23 | 1.67 |
| StSq1 | 1.8 | 0.13 | 1.93 |
| 2F+2Lo< | 3.52 | -0.9 | 2.62 |
| 2Lz+1Lo<<+2F | 4.4 | -0.53 | 3.87 |
| 1A+2T | 2.64 | 0 | 2.64 |
| CCoSp1V | 1.7 | 0 | 1.7 |
| Component | Factor | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 1.08 | 3.78 |
| Interpretation of the Music | 1.08 | 3.53 |
| Performance | 1.08 | 3.72 |
| Skating Skills | 3.96 | 14.61 |
Printed deductions 1.5
2016
Intermediate Ladies QR Grp A Free skate 2017 Southwest Pacific Regional FS Championships 43.4 points 8th of 16
- Place
- 8th
- Score
- 43.4
- Technical
- 19.69
- Components
- 24.21
- Deductions
- 0.5
| Element | Base | GOE | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.3 |
| 2Lz+1Lo | 2.6 | -0.3 | 2.3 |
| 2F | 1.9 | -0.9 | 1 |
| FSSp2 | 2.3 | -0.53 | 1.77 |
| 1A+2T | 2.64 | 0 | 2.64 |
| 2F+1Lo+2S | 4.07 | -0.9 | 3.17 |
| ChSt1 | 2 | 0.7 | 2.7 |
| 2Lz | 2.31 | 0 | 2.31 |
| CCoSp2 | 2.5 | 0 | 2.5 |
| Component | Factor | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 1.4 | 5.17 |
| Interpretation of the Music | 1.4 | 4.73 |
| Performance | 1.4 | 4.55 |
| Skating Skills | 2.1 | 7.48 |
| Transitions | 0.7 | 2.28 |
Printed deductions 0.5
Majority
In 6.0 judging each judge ranks the skaters. “3/1” means three judges placed this skater first, a majority of the panel.
How scoring works6.0 results
Judges rank the skaters instead of scoring them, so a 6.0 result is a placement and cannot be compared as a number.
How scoring worksIJS
The International Judging System scores every element and the program components, and the points add up to the total.
How scoring worksCJS
The judging system used at Compete USA events scores program components only, with no element scores, so its totals do not compare with IJS totals.
How scoring worksTechnical score (TES)
The points for every jump, spin and step sequence: each element’s base value plus its grade of execution.
How scoring worksComponent score (PCS)
The judges’ marks for the program as a whole, such as skating skills, composition and presentation, multiplied by a factor.
How scoring worksDeductions
Points taken off the segment score, for example for a fall or a time violation.
How scoring worksGrade of execution (GOE)
The judges’ quality grade for an element, from −5 to +5, added to or taken from its base value.
How scoring worksCall marks
q quarter short · < under-rotated · << downgraded · e wrong edge · ! unclear edge. The technical panel adds them to the element code.
How scoring works